bloodyperky: (pic#2311930)
( kanone ) hilbert ([personal profile] bloodyperky) wrote in [community profile] asgardeventide2012-06-17 07:22 am

anon text.

Well, it seems like it's just one flood after another.

It's a bit strange, though. Judging from the reactions and how many people seem to recognize one another, it seems that a good deal of people are honest enough to use their real names and identities.

I wonder why is that.

For those that have already been recognized-- I suppose it can't be helped. But for those with nary a person from their world, I wonder why there are people who are still inclined to use their real identities. As gray as the city is, it's a bit of a blank slate, isn't it? Perhaps the only people who truly know who you are are the Gods-- and who knows how much they care. Certainly not enough to warn us of potentially dangerous characters amidst our so-called friends~ ★

And besides, surely there are things you don't like about yourself.

Things that you don't want others to know.

Things that you wish you could change.

Things that you wish could be otherwise.

Wouldn't you say this is the perfect opportunity to be whom you've always wanted to be?

In fact, I'm sure that a few of us have caught on already. Who's to say that the person you met yesterday was using their real name and identity? Who's to say they really are who they claim to be? How much should you trust these people whom you've come to call your 'friends'? There's no need to tell the truth. Not if everything can be believed.

Perhaps the next time you introduce yourself, keep this in mind-- nobody knows who you are, and who knows just who you are talking to~ ★
samantha_grey: (Riiight)

Anon - Text

[personal profile] samantha_grey 2012-06-17 06:47 pm (UTC)(link)
[It took her some time to calm down, though eventually she managed it. This comment, though, interested her at least a little. Admittedly, it sounded like a lot of wishful thinking to her. She really didn't care what anyone said. This was a plot of her father's if she'd ever seen one, so why should she assume she could ever escape being what she was?]

Have you considered that someone trapped here might already assume that those they would hide from already know they are here and sees little point concealing their name for that reason? Besides, do you really think we can stop being what we are so easily, just because we want it?
samantha_grey: (Riiight)

Anon - Text

[personal profile] samantha_grey 2012-06-19 06:24 pm (UTC)(link)
That would depend entirely on the person in question. If they did not wish to hide from the ones who knew, or did not care, that would probably mean that they would not make any undue effort to conceal themselves. The lack of caring, or even the open daring would involve openly presenting themselves. However, if they still wished to hide, the anonymous trick could work, though it would be clearly anonymous and giving itself a name and identity. Would this be trusted?
samantha_grey: (Riiight)

Anon - Text

[personal profile] samantha_grey 2012-06-19 06:48 pm (UTC)(link)
If they were happy with the possibility of the people being there, there would likely be little need for anonymity. Possibly, but unlikely.

You could make a case for anonymity, but I do not know that everyone would agree to it. Many of these people seem to like their visuals and their little public chats. They also seem to trust each other easily.
samantha_grey: (Annoyed)

Anon - Text

[personal profile] samantha_grey 2012-06-20 06:14 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not. Nobody who trusts that much ever walks out of their lives unscathed. Whether or not I give out my name does not matter much to this little talk. A name's a tiny thing in the grand scheme of things. I don't trust anyone in this city, not yet. Trust has to be earned, and maybe they could use a lesson in why one of these days.
samantha_grey: (Nonplussed)

Anon - Text

[personal profile] samantha_grey 2012-06-21 11:11 am (UTC)(link)
The person seeking to earn it. The only person something is valuable for is the one who wants it. Personally, I don't think it's worth it.
samantha_grey: (Riiight)

Anon - Text

[personal profile] samantha_grey 2012-06-22 04:53 am (UTC)(link)
Not if they're smart. People can be alarmingly dumb at times.
samantha_grey: (Annoyed)

Anon - Text

[personal profile] samantha_grey 2012-06-22 12:41 pm (UTC)(link)
I would rather not exist in the first place. That, however, was never an option for me. I would settle for people learning their lesson, but I will not force them to do so.
samantha_grey: (Riiight)

Anon - Text

[personal profile] samantha_grey 2012-06-22 01:00 pm (UTC)(link)
[Bwah? That one sort of made Samantha's eyebrow raise and she frowned, scrunching her nose. What did he mean the anonymous writer mean by that?]

It is, yes. They can be offended and can even have my existence if they really want it, and can somehow find a way to replace me. Like I said, it's not that easy to just get rid of me. If it were that easy, we wouldn't be having this lovely little chit-chat.
samantha_grey: (Peeved)

Anon - Text

[personal profile] samantha_grey 2012-06-22 01:15 pm (UTC)(link)
You say that as if it hasn't been attempted before. Like I said. It is not that simple. We are long past the point of challenging. It is simply reality.
samantha_grey: (Annoyed)

Anon - Text

[personal profile] samantha_grey 2012-06-22 01:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Salvation? That's a laugh. God's an ass, and I'm not putting these locals on any higher pedestal. There is no salvation, not unless I tear it out of the hands of those who stole it from me myself.
samantha_grey: (Nonplussed)

Anon - Text

[personal profile] samantha_grey 2012-06-22 03:47 pm (UTC)(link)
[Perhaps the most frustrating element of this conversation was the fact that Samantha could not tell if she found this person intriguing or irritating.]

No, I suppose that this wasn't the purpose of the conversation in the first place, was it? I think, though, that we've covered about all that we can on the topic, unless you wanted to try it from another angle.
samantha_grey: (Pensive)

Anon - Text

[personal profile] samantha_grey 2012-06-22 04:34 pm (UTC)(link)
You may. I reserve my privilege in answering them, as you might expect.

Anon - Text

[personal profile] samantha_grey - 2012-06-23 04:10 (UTC) - Expand

Anon - Text

[personal profile] samantha_grey - 2012-06-23 13:26 (UTC) - Expand

Anon - Text

[personal profile] samantha_grey - 2012-06-23 14:02 (UTC) - Expand

Anon - Text

[personal profile] samantha_grey - 2012-06-23 14:33 (UTC) - Expand

Anon - Text

[personal profile] samantha_grey - 2012-06-23 20:44 (UTC) - Expand