considered: (pic#7243850)
ᴊᴀᴍɪᴇ ᴍᴏʀɪᴀʀᴛʏ ([personal profile] considered) wrote in [community profile] asgardeventide2014-01-09 09:59 pm

001. ᴀɴᴏɴ ᴛᴇxᴛ.

Good afternoon, Asgard.

Let us begin with a swift inspection of common knowledge.

What force are the Gods themselves subjected to?

Hint:

ἀνάγκᾳ δ’ οὐδὲ θεοὶ μάχονται



p.s: Mind your breathing when you go outside. It might prove to be unpleasant.
tigers: (Don't make a fuss old chap)

[personal profile] tigers 2014-01-11 08:27 pm (UTC)(link)
[ Joke's on you, pal. This one hasn't a clue about the Arsenal; they won't be formed for another year in his time. His obsession lies with tigers and firearms and his facial hair. He is a charming individual indeed.

Unfortunately, he isn't getting "Moriarty" from this quite yet. If he had, he'd be shutting up.
]

Ain't nothing sore or lost about it, chummy. It's the truth, ain't it? Your sort like to play clever with your deductions and your ciphers when really, all you're doing is rattling off nonsense. I'd wager damn near anything that bit of code is little more than a grocery list or a recipe for plum pudding.

[ Just because you can't read it, Moran.... ]
tigers: (What the deuce?)

[personal profile] tigers 2014-01-15 02:29 am (UTC)(link)
[ He knows a bit about the higher culture. He's read philosophers--and disagreed with most of them. He's read poetry--and critiqued it viciously. He isn't an unintelligent man, but he is a very dumb man all the same. If he took a moment to look, he might notice that the message is in Greek, not code.

But he isn't going to do that.

ACTUALLY, give him a moment.
]

Holmes, you really must stop attempting to be anonymous. You've always been rubbish at it and you're still rubbish at it.
unpuzzling: (123)

[personal profile] unpuzzling 2014-01-15 07:00 am (UTC)(link)
It seems you have me, after all. I wished to see how people would respond to it without their already apparent and present assumptions regarding my name. Forgive me, Moran. You truly are too sharp for me.

[He acts without remarking to Moriarty that he intends to.

This is how he directs himself here, after all.]
tigers: (Causes don't pay.)

[personal profile] tigers 2014-01-16 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)
[ He really is expecting a different Holmes, but hey--"Sherlock Holmes" still shows up twice on the list of travelers. With no face to prove him otherwise, why wouldn't this be the Holmes with the poor hygiene? ]

Apology accepted to some extent, old chap. Brilliant that you've finally come to see the truth.
unpuzzling: (049)

[personal profile] unpuzzling 2014-01-18 05:07 am (UTC)(link)
People promote these 'social experiments' quite often. You can't blame me for attempting one of my own.

Still, I suppose I could have been subtler. I was found out, after all.
tigers: ('Balls' I said. With feeling.)

[personal profile] tigers 2014-02-01 06:00 am (UTC)(link)
Certainly not. Though, perhaps I can blame you for trying this particular "social experiment" for the third time in a row. Good god, how uncreative can you be?
unpuzzling: (101)

[personal profile] unpuzzling 2014-02-02 07:41 am (UTC)(link)
Three times, is it?

It appears my memory's failing me these days. Too many deaths in Asgard. Such a tricky thing.
tigers: (The old 'madman' act.)

[personal profile] tigers 2014-02-04 04:55 am (UTC)(link)
You know damn well it's been three times.
unpuzzling: (002)

[personal profile] unpuzzling 2014-02-04 07:35 am (UTC)(link)
This is where we're at an impasse, Moran. There is not one, but three Sherlocks here. So three times. It does help the repetition, at least.
tigers: (Moderate your 'cobra neck' Prof.)

[personal profile] tigers 2014-02-04 07:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, good god. Three of you tossers in one city? I'm surprised the gods can bear it. Which are you, then? We have cheekbones, poor personal hygiene, and a mystery Holmes on our plate, it would seem.
tigers: (That was the question I'd never answer.)

[personal profile] tigers 2014-02-06 09:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Mystery Holmes, then. It would seem you're no better at disguising your identity than your counterparts, old chap.
unpuzzling: (027)

[personal profile] unpuzzling 2014-02-06 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Your wisdom aside, I otherwise consider it a successful experiment.